The Checkers speech

Part two

Richard Nixon

September 23, 1952

By way of introduction: we recommend going through the first part of the analysis before reading on, or reading the full transcript of the speech.

Various motifs will be woven through this speech, and each of them appears for a purpose that is fulfilled later in the speech.

Leading motif / word

A word, sentence, a hero which you reference to make a permanent association with the speech.

Also called leitmotiv, a term from music theory. In your speech it can take form of just one word, one sentence, a whole situation, a hero, some mental image that is repeated enough times during your speech to be memorized by the audience.

When to use?

  • If your structure is complicated, a leading motif can communicate ends of specific parts of your speech and transitions to the following ones.
  • If your speech contains concepts that are difficult to explain - to introduce additional narrative that eases adoption of these concepts.
  • When you want to anchor between some word or item and meaning of your speech, so that people using this word of item could remember your message.

A leading motif should be simple and known to your audience, to avoid multipicating complexity of your speech. It also can be related to something your audience identifies with.

from 0s

Summary: all the motifs so far

  1. Money for private use;
  2. Favours in return for money;
  3. The wife;
  4. A wife on the payroll;
  5. Corruption;
  6. Communism.
It isn't easy to come before a nationwide audience and bare your life, as I've done. But I want to say some things before I conclude, that I think most of you will agree on. Mr. Mitchell, the Chairman of the Democratic National Committee, made the statement that if a man couldn't afford to be in the United States Senate, he shouldn't run for the Senate. And I just want to make my position clear. I don't agree with Mr. Mitchell when he says that only a rich man should serve his Government in the United States Senate or in the Congress. I don't believe that represents the thinking of the Democratic Party, and I know that it doesn't represent the thinking of the Republican Party.

This argument with an omitted premise rests on the following premises:

The omitted premise is false, because depending on how you read it Nixon either is, or is not, someone who can run; after all, Nixon is able to support himself and his family even without a large salary.

This is a deliberate move.

Argument with an omitted premise

A kind of argument where one of the premises is omitted (and filled in automatically by the audience).

This is an element similar to argument from deduction, when one of the premises is deliberately omitted. Also called enthymeme. This omission serves a few purposes, when:

  1. You want to omit obvious premises (such as the existence of air, gravity, sun, etc.)
  2. You want to omit a part of reasoning to simplify or to shorten your speech
  3. Your audience has a common understanding of your premises (e.g. you probably do not want to explain electric current on an electricians' conference, and the other way around in a school)
  4. You want to deliberately omit weak premises (we discourage doing that)

Enthymemes are similar to common themes (topos), which are the common knowledge, experiences, culture that connect you and your audience. Enthymemes are a form of reasoning based in common themes and other premises.

Used properly they can make the speech more dynamic, leave out all unimportant elements to your reasoning and focus on the main points and key information. This will make your speech more concise, less boring and will help in keeping audience engaged.

from 30s
It lets Nixon, in populist fashion, take the side of the majority of people.
I believe that it's fine that a man like Governor Stevenson, who inherited a fortune from his father, can run for President. But I also feel that it's essential in this country of ours that a man of modest means can also run for President, because, you know, remember Abraham Lincoln, you remember what he said: "God must have loved the common people -- he made so many of them."
A comparison is used between a loosely defined archetype of a person and the archetype of the rich man, represented by Stevenson. Since the previous paragraph has already established that archetype as alien, this rubs off on Stevenson himself as well.

Reference

Address the common context between you and the audience (situational or cultural).

Reference is an addres to a common context between you and your audience. It helps to establish some relation between the speaker and the audience.

A reference can be made to the venue your speech takes place on, common experience, common people and even to earlier parts of your speech.

An allusion is similar to a reference, if you are not going to name directly the thing in common, but still the message will be easy to anyone to understand.

It can be used to attach positive or negative connotations to anything, by finding some links between your topic and people known as virtuous or descpicable by your audience. Be sure not to make it comical, unless your goal is satire.

When to use?

  • Whenever you want to establish a common ground with your audience.
  • As a kind of humour - but make sure you'll not base all of it on references only.
  • To discover common needs and problems.
  • To remind of earlier parts of your speech.

Consider making not too many references when discussing hard to understand topics, as they require some cognitive effort from your audience.

from 15s
On top of that, an apt quotation further supports the speaker's message, through the figure of Abraham Lincoln that it invokes.

Quote

Quote someone's statement.

A quote can perform one of the following functions:

  1. Shows an opinion as a starting point for your reasoning or as an idea to be considered by your audience
  2. Inspires to action or amplifies your argumentation in a similar fashion as an appeal to authority
  3. Counterbalances your own points and further develops understanding of the topic
  4. Summarizes your ideas in a clear and concise way, easy to spread further.

A well put quote can improve audiences' impression of you - they might identify that as a sign of being well-educated and well-read. However, a quote cannot stand on its own, so it needs to be tightly coupled to your main points.

from 30s
And now I'm going to suggest some courses of conduct. First of all, you have read in the papers about other funds, now, Mr. Stevenson apparently had a couple. One of them in which a group of business people paid and helped to supplement the salaries of State employees. Here is where the money went directly into their pockets, and I think that what Mr. Stevenson should do should be to come before the American people, as I have, give the names of the people that contributed to that fund, give the names of the people who put this money into their pockets at the same time that they were receiving money from their State government and see what favors, if any, they gave out for that.
Everything said so far, all of Nixon's earlier baring of himself, was built with this moment in mind. Now, looking like an innocent man, Nixon can use the same tools to divert attention and attack his opponents. He begins with the motif of favours in return for money.
The plain presentation of the fact that Stevenson has funds of his own, and the accusation that government salaries were topped up from them, is tied – in the context of everything Nixon has said so far – to the expectation of the same kind of account that the audience has just been given.
This call will be repeated several more times.

Present a fact

Present a state of things, present proofs. Show the circumstances leading to an event. Factual argument.

Many speeches refer to reality in some way. Even in fiction there is a notion of the represented world, which follows a set of rules and constraints. In both cases you can refer to them by using facts.

In the simplest case, it's real evidence - an item, document that cannot be discredited by aby of the parties involved. In a judicial speech these would consist of the items found on the place of an accident.

In an informative speech these might consist of the statistical data gathered from a large sample by a reputable institution (e.g. census data).

When to use?

  • When the solutions you are going to propose are derived from the factual state of things.
  • When reality imposes constraints that need to be adressed.
  • When you are going do use facts to determine which solutions are possible or feasible.
  • When the status quo is a motivation for the hero to attain the goal and face difficulties.

For a proper presentation of facts it's important to break them down into prime factors and to remove all evidence that do not affect your conclusions.

When you lay all the facts before your audience, they will have grounds to follow your reasoning, repeating your train of thoughts in their own heads and reaching the same conclusions on their own.

Skoncentruj się tu na zdolności do rozpowszechniania tej wiedzy dalej, odpowiadając bezpośrednio, albo pośrednio na pytanie Co powinien powiedzieć odbiorca Twojej mowy komuś, kto nie zna tematu?

You are still responsible to make interpretation of the facts, as these typically do not lead directly to conclusions.

from 60s
I don't condemn Mr. Stevenson for what he did, but until the facts are in, there is a doubt that will be raised. And as far as Mr. Sparkman is concerned, I would suggest the same thing. He's had his wife on the payroll. I don't condemn him for that, but I think that he should come before the American people and indicate what outside sources of income he has had. I would suggest that under the circumstances both Mr. Sparkman and Mr. Stevenson should come before the American people, as I have, and make a complete financial statement as to their financial history. And if they don't, it will be an admission that they have something to hide. And I think you will agree with me -- because, folks, remember, a man that's to be President of the United States, a man that's to be Vice President of the United States, must have the confidence of all the people. And that's why I'm doing what I'm doing. And that's why I suggest that Mr. Stevenson and Mr. Sparkman, since they are under attack, should do what they're doing.
The words I don't condemn [...] serve here – by pointing to a lack of oversight while withholding outright condemnation – to stir unease through the audience's own doubts.
Next, with the person of Sparkman, the motifs of a wife on the payroll and money for private use are brought back; Nixon puts them in one line with Sparkman and again calls – this time on both men – to give a proper account.
Finally, he puts two choices before the audience. Either the accounts are presented, or the politicians he named have something to hide.
This is a cognitive bias known as dichotomous thinking. So that the listener does not dwell on it, Nixon immediately recalls his words from the beginning of the speech, the juxtaposition of the Vice President of the United States and trust.

Reference

Address the common context between you and the audience (situational or cultural).

Reference is an addres to a common context between you and your audience. It helps to establish some relation between the speaker and the audience.

A reference can be made to the venue your speech takes place on, common experience, common people and even to earlier parts of your speech.

An allusion is similar to a reference, if you are not going to name directly the thing in common, but still the message will be easy to anyone to understand.

It can be used to attach positive or negative connotations to anything, by finding some links between your topic and people known as virtuous or descpicable by your audience. Be sure not to make it comical, unless your goal is satire.

When to use?

  • Whenever you want to establish a common ground with your audience.
  • As a kind of humour - but make sure you'll not base all of it on references only.
  • To discover common needs and problems.
  • To remind of earlier parts of your speech.

Consider making not too many references when discussing hard to understand topics, as they require some cognitive effort from your audience.

from 15s
The words And that's why I suggest that Mr. Stevenson and Mr. Sparkman, since they are under attack, should do what they're doing confirm that the charges have been deflected and redirected at his political opponents.
Now let me say this: I know that this is not the last of the smears. In spite of my explanation tonight, other smears will be made. Others have been made in the past. And the purpose of the smears, I know, is this, to silence me, to make me let up. Well, they just don't know who they're dealing with. I'm going to tell you this: I remember in the dark days of the Hiss case, some of the same columnists, some of the same radio commentators who are attacking me now and misrepresenting my position, were violently opposing me at the time I was after Alger Hiss. But I continued to fight because I knew I was right, and I can say to this great television and radio audience that I have no apologies to the American people for my part in putting Alger Hiss where he is today. And as far as this is concerned, I intend to continue to fight.
This whole paragraph centres on Nixon's earlier success in exposing Alger Hiss, a high-ranking State Department official and at the same time an agent of the Soviet GRU. The motif of Communism is invoked.
This prepares the ground for reframing the audience, so that they see the world the way Nixon wants them to. The audience should see a threat in the present state of the United States.
Why do I feel so deeply? Why do I feel that in spite of the smears, the misunderstanding, the necessity for a man to come up here and bare his soul as I have? Why is it necessary for me to continue this fight? And I want ta tell you why. Because, you see, I love my country. And I think my country is in danger. And I think the only man that can save America at this time is the man that's running for President, on my ticket -- Dwight Eisenhower. You say, "Why do I think it'is in danger?" And I say, look at the record. Seven years of the Truman-Acheson Administration, and what's happened? Six hundred million people lost to the Communists. And a war in Korea in which we have lost 117,000 American casualties. And I say to all of you that a policy that results in the loss of 600 million people to the Communists, and a war which cost us 117,000 American casualties isn't good enough for America. And I say that those in the State Department that made the mistakes which caused that war and which resulted in those losses should be kicked out of the State Department just as fast as we get 'em out of there.
Finally, Nixon plays his last card: he appeals to the authority of General Eisenhower, his running mate.

Appeal to authority

Summon great people with your words and stand with them in front of your audience.

Despite being controversial, an appeal to authority used tactfully can make a strong, lasting impression in your audience.

Why?

By summoning a person known both to you and your audience, you have better chances to invite your audience to the world presented in your speech. Appeal to that person's behaviour or quote him or her. Your audience will identify that as a sign of being well-educated, well-read, and knowing the history of your topic.

When to use?

  • As an introduction or conclusion of your reasoning, or its cohesive fragment.
  • You can self-reference the authority after presenting your main points.
  • Inside a longer narrative to shake up things a little.
  • As a transition between narratives.

How?

  • Summon people known to your audience.
  • Your audience should want to undermine such people as authorities.
  • You can address only favorable arguments and statements made by an authority in your case, however it's risky as you can be considered as biased.
  • Your audience expect reliable sources. A Nobel prize laureate is not necessarily an expert on gardening too.
from 10s

In doing so he achieves the following:

He goes on to give impressive-sounding numbers, in order to present the Truman Administration as an inept government that allowed the evil he is speaking of.
One may wonder whether the United States, as a single country, ought to be looking after 600 million people around the world who were lost to Communism.
And let me say that I know Mr. Stevenson won't do that because he defends the Truman policy. And I know that Dwight Eisenhower will do that, and that he will give America the leadership that it needs. Take the problem of corruption. You've read about the mess in Washington. Mr. Stevenson can't clean it up because he was picked by the man, Truman, under whose Administration the mess was made.
Nixon interweaves the motif of Communism with the motif of corruption, using the arguments in whatever order suits him. They are not precisely defined arguments: reports about the mess in Washington can mean different things to different people.
You wouldn't trust the man who made the mess to clean it up. That's Truman. And by the same token you can't trust the man who was picked by the man who made the mess to clean it up and that's Stevenson. And so I say, Eisenhower, who owes nothing to Truman, nothing to the big city bosses -- he is the man that can clean up the mess in Washington. Take Communism. I say that as far as that subject is concerned the danger is great to America. In the Hiss case they got the secrets which enabled them to break the American secret State Department code. They got secrets in the atomic bomb case which enabled 'em to get the secret of the atomic bomb five years before they would have gotten it by their own devices. And I say that any man who called the Alger Hiss case a red herring isn't fit to be President of the United States.
Nixon keeps developing his line of thought, building another false dichotomy: on one side of the scales the good, incorruptible Eisenhower (and his people, himself included), on the other Truman (and his people, Stevenson included).
An example follows, going into more detail on the espionage of Alger Hiss and similar cases, because it will help knock down Stevenson's position in the next paragraph.

Example / What if?

An argument from similarity to a past event or a hypothetical train of thought.

Example (exemplum in Latin) is a reference to events that are not directly related to the topic discussed, but may be used because one can draw similarities between them. If there is no such example in the world, you can make a visualisation of how would the things go given a set of assumtions related to the topic, and from then reason out consequences of these assumptions, decisions and issues that would happen given that the assumptions were true.

Real-world examples

Search for similar events that happened in the past. These events might differ from your case in some assumptions (e.g. different countries and laws, smaller or bigger scale, experimental / production status). Do not be afraid to bring even some exotic examples as they can potentially help prove at least part of your reasoning.

You can also use these events to describe what has been done in the past. It can be a good ground to discuss why your solution is innovative and better than the competition.

Hypothetical what-if scenarios

This argument is based on a visualization of a world, where you make a few controlled changes and form a logic-based reasoning showing what would happen to this world under the changes implemented.

It's very similar to how science-fiction writers construct their stories. Make one or two key changes and let the consequences play out on their own. Try to find out how such change would affect people living in the near and far future - or if that change was introduced in the past, what has been changing until now? Are there benefits to these changes? Are there problems or issues to them?

When describing examples to your audience be ready to answer some questions and objections. Such speculation is often hard to predict all of the consequences and other people can draw conclusions on their own. If you want to deliberate on the best solution for a given problem all these objections should be somehow addressed.

You can focus on benefits of your solution or focus on losses and possible catastrophic consequences of not choosing your solution. Of course, do not overdrammatize here.

Consider putting your auditorium in the center of your visualization, how they would behave, how they would act. This allows for more interaction and engagement.

from 60s
I say that a man who, like Mr. Stevenson, has pooh-poohed and ridiculed the Communist threat in the United States -- he said that they are phantoms among ourselves. He has accused us that have attempted to expose the Communists, of looking for Communists in the Bureau of Fisheries and Wildlife. I say that a man who says that isn't qualified to be President of the United States. And I say that the only man who can lead us in this fight to rid the Government of both those who are Communists and those who have corrupted this Government is Eisenhower. Because Eisenhower, you can be sure, recognizes the problem, and he knows how to deal with it.
Here emphasis is placed on the position of Stevenson, who is charged with not being fit for the office of President or Vice President of the United States.

Emphasis

Emphasis helps to bring out arguments that support your matter. Its is achieved by deliberately giving more time to discuss supporting argumetns and to use more emotionally charged wording, rhetorical figures or idioms to strengthen some arguments and weaken others.

To emphasize consider:

  1. Changing time proportions of other arguments
  2. Use gradation of adjectives (e.g. good, better, best) or based on rarity of words (e.g. good, excellent, magnificent).
  3. Use flowery language to convey specific emotions.

Emphasis' function is to weaken or strengthen of an argument or a message to make it look more important, more proven or conversely more ridiculous as it is in reality. In informative speeches you can use emphasis to make your key points more significant, achieve better memory retention or simplify a hard topic.

from 45s
Through these few paragraphs two powerful on-stage images of two figures are built, images the audience will not easily forget.

On-stage image

Plant a visualisation of a concrete image, item, situation on the stage.

By using speech, eye contact, stage movements and gestures simulate a real object, situation, person in a specific point on the stage. Just like you were putting a holographic projection on a stage.

Typically you are going to leave 0 seconds in this part's duration field, as on-stage images typically take place during another part (such as a story, introduction of a concept, etc.)

A success of on-stage image is based on the consistence of illusion and your performance. This is why this technique is one of the more difficult ones, as not only it requires you to have a great understanding of your speech, but also it requires you to be aware of all the images you've planted onto the stage. One inconsistency can shatter this image.

from 0s
Now let me that finally, this evening, I want to read to you just briefly excerpts from a letter which I received, a letter which after all this is over no one can take away from us. It reads as follows:
This is another constant, the second in the speech (after the dog Checkers), which Nixon uses to show his strength and the steadfastness of his values.

Dear Senator Nixon,

"Since I am only 19 years of age, I can't vote in this presidential election, but believe me if I could, you and General Eisenhower would certainly get my vote. My husband is in the Fleet Marines in Korea. He' a corpsman on the front lines and we have a two month old son he's never seen. And I feel confident that with great Americans like you and General Eisenhower in the White House, lonely Americans like myself will be united with their loved ones now in Korea. I only pray to God that you won't be too late. Enclosed is a small check to help you in your campaign. Living on $85 a month it is all I can afford at present, but let me know what else I can do."

Folks, it's a check for $10, and it's one that I will never cash. And just let me say this: We hear a lot about prosperity these days, but I say why can't we have prosperity built on peace, rather than prosperity built on war? Why can't we have prosperity and an honest Government in Washington, D.C., at the same time? Believe me, we can. And Eisenhower is the man that can lead this crusade to bring us that kind of prosperity.
The letter appears in order to join, in an emotional way, the emotional charge of the first part of the speech, where Nixon talked about his finances, with the second, accusatory part of the speech, through the figure of authority, General Eisenhower.
In addition, as an example it suggests that the other payments into Nixon's $18,000 fund may have been just as innocent and sincere.
And now, finally, I know that you wonder whether or not I am going to stay on the Republican ticket or resign. Let me say this: I don't believe that I oughta quit, because I'm not a quitter. And, incidentally, Pat's not a quitter. After all, her name was Patricia Ryan and she was born on St. Patrick's day, and you know the Irish never quit. But the decision, my friends, is not mine. I would do nothing that would harm the possibilities of Dwight Eisenhower to become President of the United States. And for that reason I am submitting to the Republican National Committee tonight through this television broadcast the decision which it is theirs to make. Let them decide whether my position on the ticket will help or hurt. And I am going to ask you to help them decide. Wire and write the Republican National Committee whether you think I should stay on or whether I should get off. And whatever their decision is, I will abide by it.
Through humility (placing himself in the hands of the party) Nixon tries to appeal to everyone in the audience he has convinced, and a call to action follows.

Call to action

Persuade and empower your audience to take action.

This element will typically be used in your conclusion. It is here that you paraphrase your whole speech into actionable points for your audience to follow. The speech up to this moment was explaining problems and possible solutions, but at this moment you are going to put the tools into the hands of your audience. You can call to do a specific thing, to stop doing a specific thing or to maintain status quo.

How to end with call to action? E.g.:

  1. Self-reference your opening statements.
  2. Make an example - I'm already doing that. Will you?
  3. With a simple anecdote that visualizes what would happen if we started doing the action now (or in near future).
  4. Presenting data in memorable format - If all of us spent one less minut with lights on...

Focus on the power to spread the idea by using memorable, short sencences. Consider answering the question: What your audience should tell somebody who does not know anything about the topic?

from 60s
The motif of the wife is used once more, to show that the decision is a united one, and to lead neatly into the next, closing paragraph.
But just let me say this last word. Regardless of what happens, I'm going to continue this fight. I'm going to campaign up and down in America until we drive the crooks and the Communists and those that defend them out of Washington. And remember folks, Eisenhower is a great man, believe me. He's a great man. And a vote for Eisenhower is a vote for what's good for America.
A third constant appears, after the dog Checkers and the letter with the $10 check. This time it is the values Nixon stands for, stated openly. The motifs of Communism and corruption appear once more.
The speech ends with fine, catchy words: And a vote for Eisenhower is a vote for what's good for America.

(part one of the analysis)

See our other materials too

European Funds Knowledge Education Development; Republic of Poland; Institute of New Technologies; European Union - European Social Fund

This application is a part of "Incubation of social innovations in the area of life-long learning of adults" co-funded by the European Union as a part of Operational Programme Knowledge Education Development 2014-2020.

Use the spacebar or arrow keys to continue.

See the whole map